There are just a few things you need to launch a business.
You need a vision (the ability to spot an opportunity or solve a previously unsolved problem), confidence, desire or passion, and a high tolerance for the probability of losing everything.
Fundamentally, this is all you need. These four things will get your business off the ground and, probably, help you land your first few customers. You don’t need much money to make this happen, and when it does, you’ll become a startup founder.
Growth, however, will bring new challenges.
Growth means you’ll probably need more employees, maybe a partner or two, a board of directors, and likely investors. You’ll need to learn new skills—what I call “adding tools to the toolbox”—so your business can scale and so you can become more effective as a founder. You’ll need to learn how to become flexible, how to be accountable to others, and become comfortable leading rather than dictating. You’ll need to improve your communications skills. You’ll need to define, develop, and maintain a culture, and figure out how you’ll deal with internal, and external conflicts (Eisenmann, Howe, & Altringer, 2017). These basic skills will carry you far, particularly if you are self-aware and introspective, and understand your shortcomings. With these “tools in your toolbox” you’re on your way to “Chief Executive Officer (CEO)-material,” but you’re not a CEO.
This point in your growth is where you get yourself into trouble as a founder. You want that CEO title because it gives some prestige and respect. While you may be the highest ranking individual in the company, overseeing the corporate decisions and managing operations, it’s disingenuous to claim the CEO title when you have only a few employees, and you’re flying by the seat of your pants, which is usually the case in a startup. You’re not fooling anyone with the title, let alone an investor.
When you take on investors, you must become a CEO; not just call yourself the CEO. The desire to have the CEO title without accumulating the skills necessary to be the CEO is the fastest way for you to lose your company as it grows. Many founders choose a voluntary succession approach when they see their investment or wealth tanking because it forces a founder to come face-to-face with the limits of their skillset (Wasserman, 2012). This decision to let go can help a founder preserve wealth and maintain involvement in the company.
Conversely, some founders are so ego-centric they never bother to learn the skills necessary to become an effective CEO and they are surprised when they’re forced out by their board (Wasserman, 2012). Steve Jobs is but one example. Although Jobs was not the CEO at the time he was fired, he was a founder who never bothered to learn those management and leadership skills necessary to serve in senior roles as the company became much larger (Siegel, 2011). The driving and demanding personality that served Jobs well as a founder did not serve the company well as it grew, and played a part in his firing. When he returned to Apple later, he had acquired the necessary skills to lead (Siegel). Unfortunately, it’s rare that a founder gets a chance to return to his or her company once fired.
The individual who can get a company off the ground is usually quite different than the individual who can run it well as it grows. The skills and abilities required of each are very different. A founder must take the time to learn new skills to transform from the role as a founder to the role true CEO if this is indeed the goal. Sometimes, though, it is not the goal. The key for entrepreneurs is to consider and develop an exit strategy from the very beginning to have a clear path toward the end goal, whatever it may be.
Remember this, though: It’s certainly fine to be the founder, but not the CEO. However, don’t claim to be the CEO until you have acquired the skills to lead and manage, and have a track record that supports your claim. Investors already know where you are on the founder-to-CEO spectrum, so all you’re doing by claiming a title without the requisite skills and experience is creating an identity crisis for yourself.
Eisenmann, T., Howe, R., & Altringer, B. (2017, June 21). What Does an Aspiring Founder Need to Know? Retrieved from hbr.org: https://hbr.org/2017/06/what-does-an-aspiring-founder-need-to-know
Siegel, J. (2011, October 6). When Steve Jobs Got Fired By Apple. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from abcnews.com: https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/steve-jobs-fire-company/story?id=14683754
Wasserman, N. (2012). The Founders Dilemma. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Photo by Ian Schneider on Unsplash
Last Updated on March 7, 2019 by David Harkins
David Harkins is a business strategist, speaker, and teacher.
He is the founder and executive consultant at David Harkins Company. In his spare time, he writes hikes, explores, and creates art. Although, not necessarily in that order.
Connect with him on social media below:
I think you are spot on. There is a difference between a founder and a CEO. Just because someone starts a startup, doesn’t mean they have the skills to be a CEO. As you stated, CEO’s need to have very specific skills to successfully lead and manage a company. As did Jobs, a founder should acquire the those skills, sooner rather than later. If not, an exit strategy should be well thought out and implemented.
Thanks! I agree that acquiring those skills sooner is the key. Sometimes, though, I don’t think founders recognize they need the extra skills. After all, you don’t know what you don’t know.